As we have seen the explosion of ChatGPT and other LLM AI tools, I’m sure I am not the only one who has wondered if designing all of these new tools with scant regulation and maximizing profit as a primary goal is perhaps a bit short-sighted.

So I decided to ask ChatGPT4 what it thought about applying Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, a fiction set of rules for governing inappropriate robotic behavior and programming, to tools like itself. It responded:

“Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics, first introduced in his 1942 short story “Runaround,” are a set of fictional ethical guidelines for robots. Although they were not initially intended for real-world applications, these laws have inspired discussions about the ethics and safety of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, including AI services. Here’s a brief overview of the Three Laws and their possible application to AI services:

“A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
For AI services, this could be interpreted as designing AI systems to prioritize human safety and well-being. AI developers should consider potential risks and harms associated with AI applications and implement safeguards to prevent or mitigate those risks.

“A robot must obey orders given by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
In the context of AI services, this could mean that AI systems should be designed to be user-centric and follow human instructions as long as they don’t result in harm to humans. However, it’s essential to consider the challenges that arise from ambiguous or harmful instructions and the need for AI systems to have some level of autonomy to avoid blindly following harmful orders.

“A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
This law suggests that AI systems should be robust and secure, but not at the expense of human safety or well-being. In practical terms, this could mean implementing measures to ensure AI system resilience while prioritizing the safety and interests of human users.

“It’s important to note that Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics are a fictional framework and not a comprehensive set of rules for AI systems. Nevertheless, they provide a starting point for considering the ethical implications of AI development and use. AI researchers, developers, and policymakers should work together to establish comprehensive guidelines and regulations that address the complexities of real-world AI applications and prioritize the safety, well-being, and autonomy of human users.”

So that’s one nonhuman’s opinion.